The emergence of the A7A5 stablecoin represents a transformative shift in global financial evasion.
Until now, the international community has relied on the dominance of the US dollar and the SWIFT system to enforce economic order, but the rise of ruble-backed digital assets suggests a sophisticated, state-sponsored insurgency against such approaches.
Launched in early 2025, A7A5 is a high-speed, high-volume bypass designed to reconnect the Russian economy with global liquidity by shielding illicit capital from the reach of Western regulators. Its rapid ascent, which saw it outpace the growth of established market leaders like Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), signals a new era where blockchain technology is weaponized by sanctioned regimes.
At its technical and operational core, A7A5 functions as a ruble-backed digital instrument operating across the Tron and Ethereum blockchains. While it is issued under the regulatory framework of Kyrgyzstan, its financial stability rests on ruble deposits held at Promsvyazbank (PSB), a Russian state-owned bank that has been subject to comprehensive Western sanctions.
The primary gateway is Grinex, a cryptocurrency exchange also based in Kyrgyzstan. Grinex appeared almost immediately after Western authorities shuttered its predecessor, Garantex, with a speed suggesting ample resources and Kremlin involvement.
By operating through Kyrgyzstan, the network exploits a regulatory gray zone that enables Russian businesses to convert rubles into A7A5 and then swap those tokens for globally liquid crypto assets.
This bridge function allows sanctioned entities to access the deep liquidity of the US dollar-pegged crypto market without holding dollar-denominated assets long enough to be targeted by the freezing mechanisms employed by issuers like Tether.
The reach of this network stretches beyond Central Asia into South America, further complicating the task of Western compliance teams. European Union investigators have identified a key cryptocurrency exchange in Paraguay, for example, which has facilitated the movement of assets, bypassing trans-Atlantic sanctions.
By routing transactions through a Kyrgyz issuer and a Paraguayan exchange, the architects of A7A5 have created a system that is difficult to dismantle through traditional diplomatic or legal means. The multi-jurisdictional approach means that if one node is compromised, the broader plumbing of the sanctions evasion route remains functional.
The growth of A7A5 has been staggering, challenging the assumption that sanctions would inevitably lead to the financial isolation of the Russian state. In 2025, the on-chain supply of A7A5 expanded by approximately $89.5bn.
To put this figure in perspective, it significantly outpaced the growth of the world’s two largest stablecoins, USDT and USDC, which added roughly $49bn and $31bn to their respective supplies over the same period.
This explosion in volume was helped by the integration of A7A5 with Promsvyazbank cards, which allowed ordinary Russians to join the crypto ecosystem with unprecedented ease. An unexpected rally in the Russian ruble, fueled by aggressive capital controls and export requirements, also reduced currency risk for users of the stablecoin, encouraging a massive migration of capital.
For the Kremlin, A7A5 is a lifeline for cross-border trade, allowing Russian firms to settle international invoices without touching the Western banking system. But for the neighboring Republic of Moldova, the stablecoin has become a direct threat to democracy.
Moldovan police and international investigators have documented how A7A5 is deployed by Russia for political subversion. Millions of dollars have been distributed through its networks to influence elections, fund anti-government protests, and pay for votes in referendums, drawing a direct link between state-sponsored money laundering and hybrid warfare.
Western responses to the threat reached a critical point late last year as the full scope of the A7A5 network became apparent. In October, the European Commission’s 19th package of sanctions introduced a comprehensive transaction ban on A7A5 stablecoin.
The bloc also targeted the administrative heart of the operation by sanctioning Old Vector and Grinex, the two Kyrgyz firms responsible for the token’s distribution and trading. It also designated five additional Russian banks, and 10 financial institutions in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, in an attempt to cauterize its banking links.
Parallel to the European response, the UK’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) moved to dismantle the Kyrgyzstani crypto networks the Kremlin relies on. OFSI designated Grinex, Old Vector, and Meer — another Kyrgyz-based exchange — for their direct roles in Russian sanctions evasion.
These coordinated actions by the US, UK, and EU have affected the token’s operational efficiency. When major decentralized exchanges like Uniswap added A7A5 to their blocklists in response to the new designations, its liquidity suffered significantly.
Daily transaction volumes, which had peaked at more than $1.5bn, dropped to roughly $500m as exchanges started freezing accounts that showed direct interaction with A7A5-linked wallets.
Despite these successes, A7A5 remains a resilient tool for Russian cross-border trade, highlighting the limitations of traditional sanctions in a decentralized world. The total transaction volume has already surpassed $100bn in less than a year of operation, and the token continues to find utility in a closed loop of sanctioned actors and sympathetic jurisdictions.
The emergence of innovations, such as Digital Promissory Notes — security instruments backed by A7A5 that can be redeemed for cash via Telegram bots or at specialized finance offices — shows it is evolving to bypass digital blocks with physical workarounds.
The rapid scaling of a ruble-backed stablecoin shows that the barriers to entry for creating a state-sponsored financial rail are lower than ever before, and the era of the West’s uncontested financial hegemony is over.
As global capital seeks functional pathways in increasingly constrained environments, the fragmentation of digital money along geopolitical lines appears inevitable. The rise of region-specific stablecoins represents a direct challenge to the effectiveness of economic sanctions and suggests a future where the global financial system is a contested space of geopolitical competition.
Stablecoins are becoming tools of financial statecraft as much as market infrastructure, while the latest sanctions have successfully slowed A7A5’s momentum and restricted its growth, the architecture remains in place. And the transition of users from Garantex to Grinex in a matter of days serves as a warning that for every node the West disables, the Kremlin is ready to launch another.
The international community must recognize that the battle against illicit finance requires constant, real-time monitoring of blockchain infrastructure across multiple jurisdictions, from the steppes of Central Asia to the heart of South America.
Protecting the integrity of the global financial system will require a level of agility and technological sophistication that matches the threats it seeks to neutralize.
Sergiy Makogon is a Non-resident Senior Fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). He is a seasoned executive and energy expert with over 20 years of expertise in the Ukrainian and Central and Eastern European (CEE) gas markets, as well as European security.
Europe’s Edge is CEPA’s online journal covering critical topics on the foreign policy docket across Europe and North America. All opinions expressed on Europe’s Edge are those of the author alone and may not represent those of the institutions they represent or the Center for European Policy Analysis. CEPA maintains a strict intellectual independence policy across all its projects and publications.
War Without End
Russia’s Shadow Warfare
CEPA Forum 2025
Explore CEPA’s flagship event.
